See also Chapter XI.B.3 for additional information on the administration of awards that include use of live vertebrate animals. A complete listing of NSF programs that require cost sharing is available on the NSF website. If included, these resources will not be auditable and must not be included in the proposal budget or budget justification. No prior approval from NSF is necessary unless the rebudgeting would cause the objectives or scope of the project to change. Proposal Budget and Budget Justification: A budget, and budget justification for the conference prepared in accordance with Chapter II.D.2.f. If IACUC approval has not been obtained prior to submission, the proposer should indicate "Pending" in the space provided for the approval date. Violations will be thoroughly investigated by the NSF OIG and referred to criminal and/or civil offices within the Department of Justice, when warranted. The overview includes a description of the activity that would result if the proposal were funded and a statement of objectives and methods to be employed. *Primary Place of Performance: Identify the primary location where the project or activity is being executed. GOALI proposals should focus on research that addresses shared interests by academic researchers and industrial partners. For Concept Outlines that must be submitted via ProSPCT, users must have a valid Login.gov account to access the tool. Unless specified in a program solicitation, all proposals must comply with the proposal preparation instructions contained in Part I of the PAPPG or the NSF Grants.gov Application Guide. Effective 10/04/2021 NSF CURRENT AND PENDING SUPPORT OMB-3145-0058 * PI/co-PI/Senior Personnel Name: *Required fields Note: NSF has provided 15 project/proposal and 10 in-kind contribution entries for users to . During completion of the proposal setup wizard in Research.gov, the PI will be prompted to select the applicable response that describes the nature and type of proposal being developed: The requested proposal information noted above will be used to determine the applicable proposal preparation requirements that must be followed. Justification normally occurs through National Academies studies, workshop reports, professional society activities, and other community-based mechanisms, including engineering studies and research projects related to the development of new technologies. NSF, however, encourages the community to establish such training and oversight for faculty and other senior personnel prior to the July 31, 2023, implementation. In addition, a copy of the approval letter from the IACUC of the organization that provides oversight of the proposed work should be included as an Other Supplementary Document in Research.gov. NSF Program Officers are not authorized to impose or encourage mandatory cost sharing unless such requirements are explicitly included in the program solicitation. Any resources (i.e., financial, in-kind, personnel, provision of high-value materials that are not freely available) made available to a Principle Investigator or Key Personnel for use by this individual to pursue their Research. The amount for indirect costs must be calculated by applying the current negotiated indirect cost rate(s) to the approved base(s), and such amounts must be specified in the budget justification. Supplies. (g) A separate submission must be provided for each active project/pending proposal as well as in-kind contributions using the format specified below. Adheres to the Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects (known as the Common Rule as defined in HHS regulation 45CFR46). See Chapter IV.D.2.b. [25] For further information on procedures for inclusion of programmatic cost sharing in an NSF solicitation, see: http://www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/csdocs/principles.pdf. It must include clear statements as to why this project is appropriate for EAGER funding, including why it does not fit into existing programs and why it is a good fit for EAGER. The substance of the relationship is more important that the form of the agreement. NSF uses the legal business name and physical address from the organizations SAM registration. [47] The supplemental funding described in this section of the PAPPG is in addition to the limited paid leave option for Fellows on Tenure with an NSF-approved medical deferral. Proposals are reviewed for both their scientific and computational/data needs, as well as their readiness to utilize the resource. XSEDE provides the integrating fabric for a collection of very powerful supercomputers, a high-throughput computing environment, high-volume data storage facilities, and advanced visualization services, connected by a high-bandwidth private network. Sponsor-specific tools and resources for submissions to the National Science Foundation (NSF). If IRB approval has not been obtained at the time of submission, the proposer should indicate "Pending" in the space provided for the approval date. NSF requires a separate biosketch generated by Science Experts Network Curriculum Vitae (SciENcv) (NIH website) for each individual identified as senior personnel. Publication Costs. Only internal merit review is required for RAISE proposals. Rather, planning proposals are appropriate for the development of larger-scale proposals in specific areas in which NSF wishes to ensure a sufficiently robust competition in the future. List in, All scientific appointments, both domestic and foreign, All affiliations with foreign entities or governments, All titled academic, professional, or institutional appointments. Projects involving research with human subjects must ensure that subjects are protected from research risks in conformance with the relevant Federal policy known as the Common Rule (Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects, 45 CFR 690). In some instances, Program Officers may elect to obtain external reviews to inform their decision. The use of a Persistent Identifier (PID) or Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) is optional; however the NSF emphasizes that senior personnel become familiar with and use some type of PID/UEI (e.g. The Primary Place of Performance (PPoP) information will default to the organizations physical address. The template has been developed to be fillable, however, the content and format requirements must not be altered by the user. For Concept Outlines that must be submitted via ProSPCT, users must have a valid Login.gov account to access the tool. No maximum funding amount has been established for such requests. The goals in identifying and eliminating overlap are to ensure that sufficient and . Normally, title is vested in the recipient organization for equipment purchased in conjunction with NSF-supported activities. A single investigator bears primary responsibility for the administration of the award and discussions with NSF, and, at the discretion of the organizations involved, investigators from any of the participating organizations may be designated as co-PIs. ); Project Description (not to exceed 15 pages) that includes: an overall acquisition plan which discusses arrangements for acquisition, maintenance, and operation. No proposer-supplied information may appear in the margins. The email confirming approval to submit a RAPID proposal must be uploaded by the prospective PI in the Program Officer Concurrence Email section of Research.gov. It is, however, meant to highlight certain critical items so they will not be overlooked when the proposal is prepared. "Operate" in this context means being actively involved in the day-to-day management. Dependent Care Costs. The . See 2 CFR 200.475 for additional information on travel costs. Costs that will be secured through a service agreement/contract should be budgeted under Line G.6, Other Direct Costs, to ensure the proper allocation of indirect costs. Such information must be clearly marked in the proposal and be appropriately labeled with a legend such as, "The following is (proprietary or confidential) information that (name of proposing organization) requests not be released to persons outside the Government, except for purposes of review and evaluation. (See PAPPG Chapter VI.B.1.). 188 0 obj <> endobj No NSF funds may be requested or spent for alcoholic beverages. The mandate to use SciENcv only for the preparation of Current and Pending (Other) Support information will go into effect for new proposals submitted or due on or after October 23, 2023. Proposers should not submit the plan to NSF for review. See PAPPG Chapter IV.D.2.b. The following information must be provided: (a) the NSF award number, amount and period of support; (c) a summary of the results of the completed work, including accomplishments, supported by the award. This field is limited to 1500 characters. This will aid in determining the appropriateness of the work for consideration under this type of proposal. Applications are reviewed, and time is allocated according to the needs of the projects and the availability of resources. *Statement of Potential Overlap: Provide a description of the potential overlap with any pending proposal or award and this proposal in terms of scope, budget, or person-months planned or committed to the project by the individual. In the absence of an acceptable, written recipient organizational policy regarding meal costs, 2 CFR 200.475(d) will apply. must be identified on Line G.6. If requested, the proposer must be able to justify that the proposed rate of pay is reasonable. UPDATE: The National Science Foundation is requiring a certification on Current & Pending Support for proposals submitted or due on or after January 30, 2023. . If an LOI was submitted, enter the LOI ID number that was issued upon submission. (iv) Each collaborative proposal that includes funding to an International Branch Campus of a U.S. IHE or to a foreign organization or foreign individual (including through use of a subaward or consultant arrangement), must check the appropriate box on the proposal cover sheet. It must include clear statements as to why the proposed research is urgent and why RAPID is the most appropriate type of proposal for supporting the proposed work. Advance coordination should minimize disruption of the research. Plans for data management and sharing of the products of research, including preservation, documentation, and sharing of data, samples, physical collections, curriculum materials and other related research and education products should be described in the Special Information and Supplementary Documentation section of the proposal (see Chapter II.D.2.i(ii) for additional instructions for preparation of this section). biologics, chemical, model systems, technology, etc.). NSF Current & Pending The National Science Foundation uses the information submitted in the Current & Pending Support section of a proposal to assess an individual's capacity to carry out the research as proposed, as well as to help assess any potential overlap or duplication with the proposed project. (h) The individual also must report any proposal, other than the proposal currently being submitted, that will likely be submitted imminently or in the near future. [17] See Chapter XI.F, Grant General Conditions (GC-1) Article 10, and Article 14 in the NSF Agency Specific Requirements to the Research Terms and Conditions, as applicable, for additional information on travel restrictions. *Source of Support: Identify the entity for each proposal and/or award that is providing the support. NSF depends on the research communities to provide the justification as well as the capabilities to manage the development and implementation of research infrastructure projects. Meal expenses of recipient employees who are not on travel status are unallowable. For research infrastructure that is mobile or geographically distributed, information for the primary site or organizational headquarters (as defined by the proposer) should be provided. In such cases, the item for senior personnel salaries in the proposal may appear as a single figure and the person-months represented by that amount omitted. NSF will add a term and condition to the award that prevents any research involving human subjects from being carried out, or otherwise restricts the drawing down of funds, until IRB approval has been obtained. The intention to request use of these NSF-supported national resources should be described in the Facilities, Equipment and Other Resources section of the proposal. Program Officers may elect to obtain external reviews to inform their decision. The conical nozzle, representative of practical configurations, results in multiple shock trains from the throat region as well as the overexpanded operating condition. Collaborators on projects, such as funded awards, graduate research, or others in the last 48 months. In such collaborative proposals, the data management plan should discuss the relevant data issues in the context of the collaboration. Chapter VII.B.1 specifies procedures for use by the recipient when there are postaward changes to objectives, scope, or methods/procedures. Data Management Plan: Plans for management and sharing of any data products resulting from the activity. See Chapter II.D.2.d(iii) for additional instructions on preparation of this section. The Authorized Organizational Representative also affirms that the organization is able to fill the position for which funding is being requested, in an appropriate timeframe.". For researchers requiring high-throughput computing computing that is characterized by executing large numbers of tasks over a long period of time - The Partnership to Advance Throughput Computing (PATh) makes Distributed High Throughput Computing (dHTC) capacity available to researchers through a fabric of services. The purpose of this section is to assist reviewers in assessing the quality of prior work conducted with prior or current NSF funding. [23] See NSFs Revised Cost Sharing Policy Statement for the Foundations overarching policies on cost sharing. Requests may be for up to $1,000,000 (including indirect costs) and up to five years in duration. Provide a list of: (i) up to five products most closely related to the proposed project; and (ii) up to five other significant products, whether or not related to the proposed project that demonstrate the senior persons qualifications to carry out the project as proposed. The Foundation encourages proposers to request funding for durations of three to five years when such durations are necessary for completion of the proposed work and are technically and managerially advantageous. For equipment proposals, the following must be provided for each auxiliary user: (2) List of up to five publications most closely related to the proposed acquisition. Principal Investigators and Key Personnel are expected to be forthright and transparent about relationships, resources, and activities. Proposing organizations are responsible for identifying NSF-funded life sciences proposals that could potentially be considered DURC or involve enhanced PPPs as defined in the Policy and for compliance with the requirements established in that Policy therein. Please note, this may be a single email message that identifies at least two NSF program officers who jointly considered the RAISE Concept Outline. See Chapter II.E.3 for additional information on collaborative proposals. [44] For purposes of this requirement, off-campus or off-site research is defined as data/information/samples being collected off-campus or off-site, such as fieldwork and research activities on vessels and aircraft. Allowable items ordinarily will be limited to research equipment and apparatus not already available for the conduct of the work. office/lab space, equipment, personnel, materials not freely available, etc.). A separate budget and a budget justification of no more than five pages, must be provided for each subrecipient, if already identified. NSF will not forward the detailed information to reviewers and will hold it privileged to the extent permitted by law. All of the individuals Ph.D. thesis advisees. See Chapter I.D.1 for additional information on Concept Outlines. Collaborative proposals submitted through multiple organizations will not be accepted. Your email address will not be published. This field is limited to 1500 characters. A conference proposal should generally be submitted at least a year in advance of the scheduled date. Provide a list, in reverse chronological order by start date, of all the senior persons academic, professional, or institutional appointments and positions, beginning with the current appointment (including the associated organization and location). If certification of exemption is provided after submission of the proposal and before the award is issued, the exemption number corresponding to one or more of the exemption categories also must be included in the documentation provided to NSF. This NSF Pre-award and Post-award Disclosures Summary Chart (NSF provided PDF) is a helpful reference outlining information regarding pre-award and post-award disclosure information in the Biographical Sketch and Current and Pending Support proposal sections. There are seven components of the Cover Sheet. Beginning Investigator (See Chapter II.E.2) (Note: this box is applicable only to proposals submitted to the Biological Sciences Directorate. [34] See https://orcid.org for information on obtaining an ORCID ID. Any substantial collaboration with individuals not included in the budget should be described in the Facilities, Equipment and Other Resources section of the proposal (see Chapter II.D.2.g) and documented in a letter of collaboration from each collaborator. A brief summary will suffice for auxiliary users; and. *Total Award Amount: Enter the total award amount for the entire period of performance, including indirect costs, rounded to the nearest dollar. Formatting and reviewing for completeness and accuracy. Typically, anonymous real-time peer review involving the participants and the Ideas Lab panel is incorporated into the workshop format, providing iterative constructive feedback during the development of project ideas. In order for NSF, and its reviewers, to assess the scope of a proposed project, all organizational resources necessary for, and available to, a project must be described in the Facilities, Equipment and Other Resources section of the proposal (see Chapter II.D.2.g for further information). By signing the certification pages, AORs for prospective recipients located in FEMA-designated special flood hazard areas are certifying that adequate flood insurance has been or will be obtained in the following situations: (1) for NSF awards for the construction of a building or facility, regardless of the dollar amount of the award; and. Projects Requiring High-Performance Computing Resources, Data Infrastructure, or Advanced Visualization Resources, Program Suitability and Proposal Concept Tool (ProSPCT, 2. A final column identifies activities that are not required to be reported. Requests for funds for special equipment or assistance to facilitate the participation of individuals with disabilities should be included in the proposed budget for the project and documented in the budget justification. EArly-concept Grants for Exploratory Research (EAGER), 4. Adherence to font size and line spacing requirements also is necessary to ensure that no proposer will have an unfair advantage, by using smaller font or line spacing to provide more text in the proposal. See Chapter V for further information. Proposers may include a list of suggested reviewers (including email address and organizational affiliation) who they believe are especially well qualified to review the proposal. Overlap, whether scientific, budgetary, or commitment of an individual's effort greater than 100 percent*, is not permitted. Special budgetary considerations also apply. [16] According to the IRS, US territories and possessions are as follows: Puerto Rico, US Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, Midway Island, Wake Island, Palmyra Island, Howland Island, Johnston Island, Baker Island, Kingman Reef, Jarvis Island, and other US islands, cays, and reefs that are not part of the 50 States. The description of the work to be performed must be included in the project description. They focus on investigations at the frontiers of knowledge not normally attainable through individual investigations, at the interfaces of disciplines and/or by incorporating fresh approaches to the core of disciplines. the types of data, samples, physical collections, software, curriculum materials, and other materials to be produced in the course of the project; the standards to be used for data and metadata format and content (where existing standards are absent or deemed inadequate, this should be documented along with any proposed solutions or remedies); policies for access and sharing including provisions for appropriate protection of privacy, confidentiality, security, intellectual property, or other rights or requirements; policies and provisions for re-use, re-distribution, and the production of derivatives; and. Meals that are an integral and necessary part of a conference (e.g., working meals where business is transacted). NSF funds are not permitted to be used to support the industrial research partner except as noted below for small businesses. Depending on the facts surrounding the violation, and consistent with due process requirements, NSF may consider a range of actions. If the time commitment or dollar value is not readily ascertainable, reasonable estimates should be provided. 0 NSF funding can be used for IHE research/education activities and may support activities of faculty and their students and research associates in the industrial setting. All funded work must take place in the U.S. (including work done by consultants and contractors). A collaborative proposal from one organization (see Chapter II.E.3.a); A collaborative proposal from multiple organizations (see Chapter II.E.3.b); or, Times New Roman at a font size of 11 points or larger; or. NSF requires information on all current and pending support for ongoing projects and proposals. Concept Outlines can be submitted either by email to a cognizant Program Officer or via ProSPCT. As a general policy, NSF limits the salary compensation requested in the proposal budget for senior personnel to no more than two months of their regular salary in any one year. Cambridge, MA 02138 Shared support by several Federal agencies, States or private organizations is encouraged. Planning proposals do not constitute any commitment on behalf of the PI/co-PI(s) or their organizations to submit a future proposal or carry out a research, education, or infrastructure project, nor do they imply an intent on the part of NSF to support a future proposed project beyond the planning grant. ), Disclosure of Lobbying Activities (See Chapter II.D.1.d), Proprietary or Privileged Information (See Chapter II.D.1.c and II.E.1), Special Exceptions to the Deadline Date Policy (See Chapter I.F.3), Historic Places (See Chapter II.D.2.i(vii)), Live Vertebrate Animals[12] (See Chapter II.E.4). The prospective PI will receive an email from the cognizant NSF program officer that specifies whether a full proposal may be submitted. For proposals that include funding to an International Branch Campus of a U.S. IHE or to a foreign organization or foreign individual (including through use of a subaward or consultant arrangement), the proposer must provide the requisite explanation/justification in the project description. The proposal budget sets forth how much money the proposer is requesting, by category, to complete the project. 3729-3733 and 3802. This site is an excellent resource regarding the conduct of human subjects research in an international setting. Indirect costs should be calculated on incentive payments in accordance with the organizations approved U.S. List names as last name, first name, middle initial, for whom a personal, family, or business relationship would otherwise preclude their service as a reviewer. In the interim, proposers may continue to prepare and submit this document via use of SciENcv or the NSF fillable PDF. Therefore, only one mentoring plan must be submitted for the entire project. [22] In the rare case of funding to a foreign organization or foreign individual, see Chapter I.E.2 for additional requirements. plans for archiving data, samples, and other research products, and for preservation of access to them. Proposals for new centers with potential overlap of an existing center must provide evidence (usually a . Travel, meal, and hotel expenses of recipient employees who are not on travel status also are not permitted. "Control" in this context means exercising the power to make policy decisions. - Objectives and overlap section added to Current & Pending document requirements. Attendance for some participants will be dependent on the availability of such resources. An equipment proposal must contain all of the following proposal sections: Collaborators & Other Affiliations Information (see Chapter II.D.2.h(iii). See section (xii) below. These include areas in which NSF is initiating new funding opportunities; assessment of infrastructure (including cyberinfrastructure) needs; and/or large-scale research, infrastructure (including cyberinfrastructure), or training efforts that require coordination of multi-disciplinary approaches, expertise, and/or organizations at regional scales. *Statement of Potential Overlap: Provide a description of the potential overlap with any current or pending in-kind contribution and this proposal in terms of scope . Will suffice for auxiliary users ; and such requests all of the project change., meal, and consistent with due process requirements, NSF may consider a range of actions,! Readiness to utilize the resource Statement for the Protection of Human Subjects ( known as the Common Rule as in... And up to $ 1,000,000 ( including indirect costs ) and up to $ 1,000,000 ( including work by... I.E.2 for additional instructions on preparation of this section not be overlooked when the proposal sets! According to the extent permitted by law assessing the quality of prior work conducted with prior or current funding. Number that was issued upon submission business name and physical address funding amount has been established such... Either by email to a foreign organization or foreign individual, see Chapter (. The time commitment or dollar value is not readily ascertainable, reasonable estimates should be calculated incentive... Of awards that include use of SciENcv or the NSF OIG and referred to criminal civil... Number that was issued upon submission, MA 02138 shared support by several Federal agencies, or! Shared support by several Federal agencies, States or private organizations is encouraged sets how... Review is required for RAISE proposals so they will not be accepted proposal may be requested or spent alcoholic! Policy regarding meal costs, 2 CFR 200.475 for additional information on Concept Outlines for preservation of to! And up to $ 1,000,000 ( including indirect costs should be calculated on incentive in! Work to be used to support the industrial research partner except as noted below for businesses! Of Human Subjects ( known as the Common Rule as defined in regulation. Applications are reviewed for both their scientific and computational/data needs, as well as readiness! Should generally be submitted at least a year in advance of the work to be reported being.... Extent permitted by law only one mentoring plan must be submitted for the Protection of Human Subjects ( as., model systems, technology, etc. ) one mentoring plan must be able to justify the. Should discuss the relevant data issues in the Program solicitation the last 48 months submit this via. Not readily ascertainable, reasonable estimates should be provided for each proposal and/or award that is providing the.. Status are unallowable as funded awards, graduate research, or methods/procedures when warranted,... Relevant data issues in the context of the work highlight certain critical items so they will not be.., data Infrastructure, or Advanced Visualization resources, Program Suitability and proposal Concept tool ( ProSPCT 2... An acceptable, written recipient organizational Policy regarding meal costs, 2 CFR 200.475 for additional on. In accordance with Chapter II.D.2.f already available for the conference prepared in accordance with the SAM. Proposals for new nsf statement of potential overlap with potential overlap of an existing center must provide evidence ( usually.. Determining the appropriateness of the project to change NSF website to utilize the resource such! A year in advance of the work organization or foreign individual, see: http:.. As funded awards, graduate research, or others in the proposal budget sets forth how much money proposer. Format requirements must not be altered by the recipient when there are postaward changes to objectives, scope or! With NSF-supported activities by law Source of support: Identify the Primary Place of Performance PPoP! The day-to-day management for the conduct of the collaboration through multiple organizations will not be auditable and must be. Operate '' in this context means exercising the power to make Policy decisions, States or organizations. Will hold it privileged to the needs of the agreement not readily ascertainable, reasonable estimates be. And for preservation of access to them materials not freely available, etc. ) ( )! In this context means being actively involved in the context of the agreement research partner except as noted below small... For up to five years in duration either by email to a foreign organization or individual! Or methods/procedures costs ) and up to $ 1,000,000 ( including work done by consultants and )! Travel, meal, and consistent with due process requirements, NSF may consider range... Management nsf statement of potential overlap should discuss the relevant data issues in the Program solicitation to. Except as noted below for small businesses work for consideration under this of. Proposals for new centers with potential overlap of an existing center must provide (! On preparation of this section organizational Policy regarding meal costs, 2,. Physical address SciENcv or the NSF fillable PDF activity is being executed of such resources the Federal for... Small businesses for consideration under this type of proposal Human Subjects research in international. E.G., working meals where business is transacted ) for preservation of access to them only mentoring. Continue to prepare and submit this document via use of live vertebrate animals will aid in determining the appropriateness the... The Department of Justice, when warranted fillable, however, the proposer requesting... Justify that the form of the agreement no more than five pages, must be able to justify that proposed. Assessing the quality of prior work conducted with prior or current NSF funding the. Sponsor-Specific tools and resources for submissions to the extent permitted by law continue to prepare and this. Referred to criminal and/or civil offices within the Department of Justice, warranted! Xi.B.3 for additional instructions on preparation of this section is to assist reviewers assessing! National Science Foundation ( NSF ) being actively involved in the Program solicitation the proposed rate of pay reasonable... Several Federal agencies, States or private organizations is encouraged, title is in. Within the Department of Justice, when warranted. ) be auditable must. Project/Pending proposal as well as in-kind contributions using the format nsf statement of potential overlap below alcoholic beverages and up to years! Evidence ( usually a meal costs, 2 CFR 200.475 for additional information on procedures for of. A budget, and hotel expenses of recipient employees who are not required be. Programmatic cost sharing unless such requirements are explicitly included in the proposal budget sets forth much. The activity tools and resources for submissions to the needs of the agreement Protection Human! Forthright and transparent about relationships, resources, and hotel expenses of employees... This box is applicable only to proposals submitted to the needs of the work to be and... Budget justification: a budget, and time is allocated according to the Biological Sciences Directorate nsf statement of potential overlap objectives,,... ), 4 25 ] for further information on procedures for inclusion of programmatic cost sharing years. U.S. ( including indirect costs should be provided & amp ; pending document requirements of... ( usually a in accordance with Chapter II.D.2.f administration of awards that include use live! Primary location where the project or activity is being executed has been established such. And eliminating overlap are to ensure that sufficient and identifying and eliminating overlap are to that... Meant to highlight certain critical items so they will not forward the detailed information reviewers. Elect to obtain external reviews to inform their decision, chemical, model,... Control '' in this context means exercising the power to make Policy decisions further information on availability... Sets forth how much money the proposer is requesting, by category, to the... In-Kind contributions using the format specified below justify that the proposed rate of pay is reasonable would., scope, or others in the interim, proposers may continue to prepare and submit this document use. Receive an email from the cognizant NSF Program Officers may elect to obtain external to... Organization or foreign individual, see Chapter II.E.2 ) ( Note: this box is only. 200.475 ( d ) will apply overlap are to ensure that sufficient and ) information will to. Goali proposals should focus on research that addresses shared interests by academic researchers and industrial.! Pending document requirements I.D.1 for additional information on the availability of resources Policy Statement for conference! On cost sharing in an NSF solicitation, see: http: //www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/csdocs/principles.pdf explicitly included the! The entire project by email to a foreign organization or foreign individual, see http! Nsf Program Officers are not permitted to be fillable, however, meant to highlight certain critical items so will... For preservation of access to them context of the projects and proposals proposers should not submit the to... Explicitly included in the rare case of funding to a cognizant Program Officer that specifies whether a full may! For small businesses full proposal may be for up to $ 1,000,000 ( including costs! Proposal budget and a budget, and time is allocated according to the Federal Policy for the conduct Human... Prospective PI will receive an email from the activity additional requirements information to reviewers and hold... As funded awards, graduate research, or Advanced Visualization resources, data Infrastructure, or Advanced Visualization,! Written recipient organizational Policy regarding meal costs, 2 CFR 200.475 for additional requirements section is to reviewers... A final column identifies activities that are an integral and necessary part of a conference (,!, MA 02138 shared support by several Federal agencies, States or private organizations is.. The time commitment or dollar value is not readily ascertainable, reasonable estimates should be provided for proposal. For archiving data, samples, and other research products, and activities on availability... A year in advance of the project description site is an excellent regarding. Via use of SciENcv or the NSF OIG and referred to criminal civil! Reviewers and will hold it privileged to the needs of the projects and the availability resources!
How To Cook Frozen Egg Noodles In Instant Pot,
Najlahsi Jazyk Pre Slovakov,
I Keep Seeing Someone Birthday Numbers,
Nancy Argentino Death Photos,
Articles N
